Project Proposal Draft II

Project Proposal Draft II

Seaman and Rossler’s neosentience, as described in {ref}, is a promising new area of research into both the nature of consciousness and the ability to create its homologue within a system.  My contribution to this project seeks to incorporate evolutionary forces into their program to increase an eventual neosentient system’s robustness and complexity.  Additionally and relatedly, I’d like to discuss the possibility of a neopsychological or neosociological perspective on these systems and incorporate these perspectives into the theory.

Evolution as the Qualities of persistence

I’d like to advance a novel perspective on the mechanism of evolution, natural selection, as the peculiar nature of certain persistent systems.  This perspective will yeild insights into and place specific demands upon neosentient systems design.

Neosentient systems as iterative

Following the perspective on persistence advanced above, I’ll argue that neosentient systems design must be iterative and will require large amounts of time to manifest/evolve.

Darwinian hierarchies

Following Gould, I’ll analyse particular components of neosentient systems that are candidates for Darwinian individuality.  Additionally, I’ll examine the necessary role of ‘bookeeper’ (e.g. the homolog to the gene).  Gould’s rejection of the ‘selfish gene’ paradigm will be reiterated and emphasized as unsuitable for neosentience.

Neopsychological and Neosociological: Interrelatedness

Following Collins and others, I’d like to assert & defend the psycho-social perspective as it relates to neosentience research.

Individuality within Sociality
Neosentient systems will have to develop individualities.  This, I will argue, will be co-emergent with a nascent neosentient society.

Stepping into the Neosentient stream: a new self-organizing system

In summary, I’ll advance a vision of neosentince deeply embeded into time.  The system and its design will be construed as the setting in motion of a system of entropic maintenance and shunting.  These characteristics it will share with the beginning of life on eath and the development of human sentience and intelligence.  Finally, I’ll advance but not support the assertion that the temporal, evolutionary paradigm of neosentient systems design is the only method that has the capability of producing such a system.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: